Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs’ Legal Team Files Motion for Acquittal or New Trial in Federal Case
Sean “Diddy” Combs’ legal representatives have submitted a comprehensive 64-page memorandum seeking either acquittal or a new trial, following his recent federal criminal trial conviction on two Mann Act counts. The filing comes months before his scheduled sentencing date.
Key Points of the Legal Filing
The defense team argues that while Combs was convicted of two Mann Act violations, the jury rejected more serious accusations including racketeering charges and sex trafficking allegations. They characterize the application of the Mann Act in this case as “unprecedented.”
According to the defense memo: “Since the government arrested Sean Combs last September, it has painted him as a monster. The government told the jury it had to convict so long as Mr. Combs arranged for a long-time girlfriend or a paid male escort or entertainer to travel across state lines to get together and have sex.”
Defense Arguments and Legal Strategy
- All participants in the events were consenting adults
- No commercial motive existed for the activities
- The Mann Act should be interpreted narrowly in this case
- Videos of events constitute protected creative expression under First Amendment
Current Status and Potential Outcomes
Combs remains housed at the Metropolitan Correction Center in Brooklyn since his September arrest, having been denied bail by three judges who deemed him high-risk. His legal team recently requested release on a $50 million bond with home confinement conditions.
The Justice Department has indicated its intention to seek a substantial sentence, particularly in light of allegations regarding a $100,000 bribe to cover up an incident involving his former girlfriend Cassie Ventura. Combs has publicly apologized for his past violent acts, calling them “inexcusable” and accepting “full responsibility.”
Upcoming Sentencing
Sentencing is scheduled for October 3, with possible outcomes ranging from time served to a maximum of 20 years in prison. The court’s response to this latest motion could significantly impact the final verdict and sentencing decision.
Note: This case continues to develop, with both prosecution and defense teams actively filing motions and presenting arguments that could influence the final outcome.