Woody Allen’s Letter to Jeffrey Epstein Reveals Disturbing Details About Manhattan Mansion
A recently uncovered letter from controversial filmmaker Woody Allen to Jeffrey Epstein draws unsettling parallels between the convicted sex offender’s Manhattan residence and “Castle Dracula,” offering new insights into the social circles of the disgraced financier.
Details of the 2016 Birthday Letter
In the letter, written for Epstein’s 63rd birthday, Allen described the Upper East Side townhome as being frequently occupied by “several young women.” The Manhattan director compared Epstein to Dracula, noting how he lived alone “in a vast house” and drawing parallels to Bela Lugosi’s character surrounded by “three young female vampires who service the place.”
High-Profile Social Gatherings
According to Allen’s account, the dinner parties at Epstein’s residence attracted an eclectic mix of notable figures, including:
- Politicians
- Scientists
- Teachers
- Magicians
- Comedians
- Intellectuals
- Journalists
- An entomologist
- A concert pianist
Broader Context and Recent Developments
The revelation comes amid renewed interest in the Epstein case, with mounting pressure for the release of the “Epstein files.” The Wall Street Journal recently exposed a birthday letter collection compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell, featuring messages from prominent figures including Donald Trump, Bill Clinton, Vera Wang, and Leon Black.
Legal Ramifications
In response to these revelations, former President Trump has filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against News Corp, specifically naming Rupert Murdoch in the complaint.
Allen’s Controversial Background
The emergence of this letter gains additional significance given Allen’s own controversial history, including allegations of sexual abuse from his adopted stepdaughter, Dylan Farrow. These accusations were recently explored in HBO’s four-part documentary series Allen v. Farrow, where Mia Farrow broke decades of silence regarding her former partner.
While Allen has consistently denied these accusations, and no charges were filed following a 1993 Connecticut state investigation, the letter’s content adds another layer to the ongoing discussions about power, influence, and accountability in high-profile circles.